Electricity prices in Switzerland are set for a shake up. Prices paid for electricity put into the grid are falling fast in some parts of the country, reported RTS. From 2026, these prices will be adjusted every quarter, rather than once a year. This will add further uncertainty to prices and the investment case for solar panels.
The changes flow from a new set of laws accepted in a referendum in June 2024. The new law will in many cases usher in lower prices for electricity injected into the grid by those with solar panels. For some this may make solar panels a challenging investment.
In the canton of Vaud, the price paid for injected electricity has already fallen from 17.6 cents per kWh to 10.15. The margin between what Romande Energie charges (32.78) and pays (10.15) is 22.63 cents per kWh. This margin includes tax, which the network does not get to keep. In addition, network providers use some of the margin to cover the costs of maintaining the network and costs associated with managing excess electricity in the summer when solar production exceeds demand.
Romande Energie is the canton’s monopoly electricity provider so it does not need to consider competitors when setting prices. Based on this, recent price adjustments, and the new laws coming into force in 2026, some fear the price could fall again.
Deteriorating investment returns and price uncertainty will make it harder to convince people to install solar panels. A key challenge is the mismatch between solar production and consumption. When climate and consumption patterns are factored in, a household consuming 5,000 kWh a year with 10 kWp of solar panels might reach only 36% self-sufficiency and need to sell 83% of production – see online calculator here. Using the prices above, these solar panels would generate CHF 590 of savings and CHF 832 from electricity sales. The problem is installing 10 kWp of solar panels might cost CHF 25,000. Assuming a 25 year life span, the return on investment would be 3%. Self-sufficiency and the overall return can be increased with batteries. But this increases the investment. Subsidies and tax deductions also help to reduce the upfront cost but these represent a charge on everyone.
Under the new law, prices for injected electricity will be calculated retroactively every quarter based on the market prices of solar electricity. A minimum price of 4.6 cents will be set at the beginning. This base amount will be increased in line with the market price, which will include an amount added to electricity from clean sources, a system designed to pay producers of clean electricity a clean premium. The clean premium has not yet been finalised but a provisional figure of 6 cents per kWh has been suggested.
Adapting prices to changes in the market and consumption patterns makes sense. However, the changes could negatively impact the economics of solar panels in Switzerland. One avenue to improve this would be to fix the market for solar panels in Switzerland. The cost per installed kWp in Switzerland can sometimes be double the cost in Germany. Another would be to improve competition and efficiency at the grid level. If grid operators could operate with lower margins they could pay more to those injecting clean electricity. Investment in batteries, both locally and at grid level will also be required to deal with the volatility of solar production.
A bit more certainty around the prices paid for the electricity injected into the grid would help too. Investors dislike incertainty. If prices are regularly cut investors in solar panels will come to expect more cuts. And to compensate they will demand higher investment returns to compensate for the risk.
More on this:
RTS article (in French) – Take a 5 minute French test now
For more stories like this on Switzerland follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
Marc Fettarappa says
Your article is biased as you are not comparing apples to apples:
The quoted Vaud energy charge price at 0.3278/KWh includes cost of transport as well as taxes .
The comparison should be with the KW only rate at 0.1398 vs 0.1015 (for Q1).
Talking about a 69% margin it totally wrong and shows you do not understand the business. Accepting injected energy on the network (especially in summer) when there is not enough consumption to match generates costs for the distributeur as he has to pay to evacuate the excess.
A distributor’s margin is solely CHF 60 per meter per year, the rest is regulated.
Please correct your article accordingly.
Le News says
Hello Marc, Thank you for your comment. We have made some clarifications to the article based on your feedback – we noted the tax, network maintenance costs and the costs to the network of dealing with excess electricity during the sunny season. If the falling prices paid for injected electricity reflect economic reality as you suggest, what can be done to restore the investment case for solar panels in your view? This question has two dimensions: the already poor return on investment and the concern that if prices have fallen once they could fall again.